CARL MELCHER GOES TO VIETNAM
The year is 1968. Like thousands of other American boys, Carl Melcher is drafted and sent to Vietnam. His new company is infected with the same racial tensions plaguing the nation. Despite that, Carl makes friends on both sides of the color line. The war, like a tiger lurking in the bushes, picks off its victims one by one. Naively over-optimistic, Carl believes that karma and good intentions will save him and his friends. Then fate intervenes to teach Carl something of the meaning of life, and death.
The year is 1968. Like thousands of other American boys, Carl Melcher is drafted and sent to Vietnam. His new company is infected with the same racial tensions plaguing the nation. Despite that, Carl makes friends on both sides of the color line. The war, like a tiger lurking in the bushes, picks off its victims one by one. Naively over-optimistic, Carl believes that karma and good intentions will save him and his friends. Then fate intervenes to teach Carl something of the meaning of life, and death.
- Thomas Dunne Books
- Hardcover
- July 2004
- 208 Pages
- 9780312329037
About Paul Clayton
Paul Clayton was drafted in 1968 and sent to Vietnam in September of that year. Clayton served with an infantry line company in the Central Highlands of Pleiku Province. After the army, he received a BA in English Literature from Temple University. He is the author of Calling Crow, Flight of the Crow, and Calling Crow Nation. Carl Melcher Goes to Vietnam was a finalist at the 2001 Frankfurt eBook Awards for nonfiction. Paul Clayton currently lives and works in California.
Praise
“In this fictional account of the Vietnam War, Clayton shuns drama and political issues, detailing instead the minutiae of one soldier’s experience. The simple language reflects the identity of an uncertain youth drawn involuntarily into a new and unfamiliar world. . . . This novel does reveal Clayton, himself drafted in 1968, to be a reflective and strategic writer.” —Library Journal
Discussion Questions
Distracted by his emotional pain and his immature fantasies, Carl’s mind is not on his job, and one could argue that he is not a very effective soldier. In fact, Carl even (jokingly?) suggests that the war is not real. Would more training have made Carl a better soldier? And what form would that training take—physical, emotional, or mental?
Discuss the two alpha males in the squad, Ron and Glock. What are their attitudes about life and the war in Vietnam, and how were they formed? And whose attitude, Ron’s or Glock’s, prevails in the squad, and why?
There was much debate in America over the war in Vietnam. Where in the novel is that addressed?
Discuss Mike’s death by friendly fire. Whose fault was it? Can these things ever be eliminated?
Discuss the death of the PAVN medic. Was there anything unusual about this action? What does this scene reveal about the characters?
Carl Melcher had a very sketchy understanding of Buddhism. Do you think this was a help or a hindrance to him? Is religious belief a help or a hindrance to those waging war?
Discuss the final scenes in the hospital and Carl’s friendship with Greg Mills and Jack Krouse. The most troubled character here seems to be Krouse; the most balanced, Mills. Carl seems to be somewhere in between. With which character did you most identify? Why?
What has Carl learned by the end of the novel? Are these “lessons” true only in relation to the Vietnam war, or do they apply to all wars?
How much of the book do you think is autobiographical?
“War is hell,” the saying goes, and much has been written about the behavior of young men during war. Based on your reading of the novel and your discussions with others, what do you think about the morality and behavior of these American soldiers in comparison with the soldiers of other nations?
The majority of soldiers in the field during the Vietnam War were draftees. Career soldiers and National guard units are fighting the current war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Which do you think is more effective and why? Do you think the draft will ever be re-instated?